Webster Awards – Categories & Eligibility 2025

This category recognizes overall excellence, outstanding journalistic achievement and broad public impact in the print or digital mediums.  Winner/finalists will display originality, enterprise and creativity in their submissions.  Breaking news, news series, beat reporting or continuing coverage of a major developing story will be eligible for entry in this category.  Maximum 5 URL’s per submission and series coverage is eligible.

Judging Guidelines:

• Impact:
  • What was the community impact?
  • As reported, were there breakthroughs in public understanding or changes in policy as a result of the journalism
  • Did the story serve the public interest with critical information and/ or at a critical time?
• Originality:
  • Did this story include content and information unique to this news outlet?
• Timeliness and Relevance:
  • Was this work current and delivered in a timely fashion?
  • Was the work relevant to a broad cross-section of the BC population?
• Craft:
  • Did the work uphold the highest standards of journalistic excellence? Did the journalism demonstrate solid research, resourcefulness and persistence? Was the material presented in a creative and compelling fashion?
• Context:
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does it reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category recognizes overall excellence, outstanding journalistic achievement and broad public impact in radio or audio mediums. Winner/finalists will display originality, enterprise and creativity in their submissions. Breaking news, new series, beat reporting or continuing coverage of a major developing story will be eligible for entry in this category. A maximum of a total of 60 minutes of audio material will be accepted for submissions and series coverage is eligible in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Impact:
  • What was the community impact?
  • As reported, were there breakthroughs in public understanding or changes in policy as a result of the journalism
  • Did the story serve the public interest with critical information and/ or at a critical time?
• Originality:
  • Did this story include content and information unique to this news outlet?
• Timeliness and Relevance:
  • Was this work current and delivered in a timely fashion?
  • Was the work relevant to a broad cross-section of the BC population?
• Craft:
  • Did the work uphold the highest standards of journalistic excellence? Did the journalism demonstrate solid research, resourcefulness and persistence? Was the material presented in a creative and compelling fashion?
• Context:
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does it reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category recognizes overall excellence, outstanding journalistic achievement and broad public impact in TV or video mediums.  Winner/finalists will display originality,  enterprise and creativity in their submissions.  Breaking news, news series, beat reporting or continuing coverage of a major developing story will be eligible for entry in this category.  A maximum of a total of 60 minutes of material will be accepted for submissions and series coverage is eligible in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Impact:
  • What was the community impact?
  • As reported, were there breakthroughs in public understanding or changes in policy as a result of the journalism
  • Did the story serve the public interest with critical information and/ or at a critical time?
• Originality:
  • Did this story include content and information unique to this news outlet?
• Timeliness and Relevance:
  • Was this work current and delivered in a timely fashion?
  • Was the work relevant to a broad cross-section of the BC population?
• Craft:
  • Did the work uphold the highest standards of journalistic excellence? Did the journalism demonstrate solid research, resourcefulness and persistence? Was the material presented in a creative and compelling fashion?
• Context:
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does it reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category recognizes individual journalists or journalist teams who exhibit exceptional skills in crafting engaging feature stories. The award recognizes creativity, originality, and a commitment to covering under-reported narratives. Entrants may only submit a single story. Text material can be submitted as a URL, with the link leading to the story, or formatted as a PDF.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice
  • What was the degree of originality of the story?
  • What was the degree of significance of the subject matter?
• Craft
  • Was the quality of writing at the highest level?
  • Was the narrative compelling?
• Impact and Relevance
  • Did the story raise awareness, prompt discussion or further investigation?
  • Ultimately, as reported, did any tangible changes occur as a result of the story?
• Context
  • How did the story enhance readers’ comprehension of the issue?
  • Did it provide new insights or perspectives?
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category acknowledges exceptional journalism by individual journalists or a team of journalists who exhibit exceptional skills in crafting engaging feature stories. The award recognizes creativity, originality, and a commitment to covering under-reported narratives.

To align with the format of a typical radio/audio news broadcast, submissions should have a cumulative duration of no more than 60 minutes. Entrants can submit one-off pieces or a series, but the submission should not exceed five uploads.ng – Radio/Audio – Newly Revised this Year

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice
  • What was the degree of originality of the story?
  • What was the degree of significance of the subject matter?
• Craft
  • Was the quality of writing at the highest level?
  • Was the narrative compelling?
• Impact and Relevance
  • Did the story raise awareness, prompt discussion or further investigation?
  • Ultimately, as reported, did any tangible changes occur as a result of the story?
• Context
  • How did the story enhance readers’ comprehension of the issue?
  • Did it provide new insights or perspectives?
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category acknowledges exceptional journalism by an individual journalist or a team, in traditional television broadcasting or through online platforms delivering video content. The award recognizes creativity, originality, and a commitment to covering under-reported narratives.

To align with the format of a typical news broadcast, submissions should have a cumulative duration of no more than 60 minutes. Entrants can submit one-off pieces or a series, but the submission should not exceed five uploads.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice
  • What was the degree of originality of the story?
  • What was the degree of significance of the subject matter?
• Craft
  • Was the quality of writing at the highest level?
  • Was the narrative compelling?
• Impact and Relevance
  • Did the story raise awareness, prompt discussion or further investigation?
  • Ultimately, as reported, did any tangible changes occur as a result of the story?
• Context
  • How did the story enhance readers’ comprehension of the issue?
  • Did it provide new insights or perspectives?
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

Presented by the B.C. Crown Counsel Association

This category recognizes over-all excellence in investigative and enterprise journalism. Entries should contain in-depth, original reporting with demonstrated impact including specific political, social or cultural change. A short, written description (100 words max) should accompany entries, demonstrating the impact of the work.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category as a series will be accepted in this category as well as single stories.

Judging Guidelines:

• Impact and Relevance:
  • What were the political, social or cultural impacts on the community?
  • What changed as a result of the story?
• Enterprise:
  • What degrees of research and enterprise were exhibited in this work?
  • Did the journalist demonstrate the skillful use of public records, data and/or confidential sources in this project?
• Originality:
  • Did the work contain unique information or official secrets uncovered by this news outlet?
  • Has the ordinary been made new, or the extraordinary understandable?
• Craft:
  • Did the journalism display solid research, resourcefulness and persistence in the preparation of this work?
  • Was the material presented in a creative and compelling fashion?
• Context:
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story or series?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category recognizes outstanding multimedia journalism that maximizes the unique and distinctive storytelling opportunities in digital spaces. It recognizes journalism that demonstrates strong content, creative storytelling and  effectively uses digital tools to reach, inform and engage audiences.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • What makes the submission uniquely suited to be told via multimedia journalism?
  • What type of experience will the audience have?
• Craft:
  • What creative uses of multimedia tools, services and platforms, design and navigation — singly or in combination — were used to enhance the audience’s understanding of the story?
• Enterprise:
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness and persistence were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact:
  • How were multimedia tools used to engage the audience and affect the story’s impact?
• UserX:
  • What is the experience for the audience/user? Is the work interactive? Does it engage in a compelling, meaningful way?
• Context:
  • What did the work tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

Endowed by Jean Cormier

Recognizes a journalist or a team of journalists for outstanding reporting for a story on complex issues in all areas of business and industry, including technology, labour issues and all aspects of business.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof.  A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This award recognizes a significant contribution to B.C. arts and culture journalism. The arts and culture category will be interpreted broadly to include reporting or criticism covering music, photography, architecture, film, food, literature, visual arts, media and the performing arts. This may include profiles of artists, features, breaking news and/or investigations in the creative industries. As independence is a hallmark of the Webster awards, sponsored segments or ‘junkets’ are not eligible for this award.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

Presented by the Law Society of BC

Recognizes a journalist or team of journalists for outstanding reporting on a story or series of stories about legal issues, the administration of justice or the legal profession in British Columbia.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

This category recognizes a journalist or a team of journalists for outstanding reporting about issues surrounding health and medicine.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

Presented by the Pacific Salmon Foundation

Recognizes a journalist or a team of journalists for outstanding reporting about our natural environment, the problems and potential solutions.

Submissions may be from print/digital, radio/audio or TV/video mediums or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio or video material or 5 URL’s can be entered in this category.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

Recognizes a journalist or a team of journalists who produce outstanding news reporting in B.C. in a language other than English. Winner/finalists will display originality, enterprise and creativity in their submissions. Breaking news, news series, beat reporting or continuing coverage of a developing story will be considered in this category.

Submissions may be print/digital, TV/video or radio/audio or a combination thereof. A maximum of 60 minutes of audio/video material or 5 URLs of related material can be entered into this category. Also, please provide your 200 word synopsis in-language followed by a version in English and also an English translation of your story must be uploaded for broadcast entries. An English translation of the script is acceptable.

Judging Guidelines:

• Story Choice:
  • Why was this story important to tell?
• Craft:
  • Is the story well told, compelling and properly explained?
  • What degrees of research, resourcefulness, persistence and creativity were exhibited in telling this story?
• Impact and Relevance:
  • As reported, what was the impact on the community/issue?
  • As reported, what changed as a result of the story?
  • Is the story relevant, creative, significant or original?
• Context:
  • What did the story tell us about how we live now or did it deepen understanding of our history?
  • Does the story reflect the community is it meant to serve?
• Balance and Diversity:
  • Was the work fair to those portrayed in and affected by the story?
  • Does the work reflect the community by including a range of diverse voices and perspectives in the coverage?

The City Mic Award is named after the ground-breaking CJOR program that established Jack Webster as one of BC’s pre-eminent commentators, and is presented in memory of Linda Webster.

This award recognizes journalists who present informed, intelligent and impactful commentary in either print, TV/video, radio/podcast or online media.

Submissions should contain up to 5 examples of work on either a single or multiple topics.

Judging Guidelines:

Judges will base their decisions on the significance of the topic, the relevance of the commentary regarding the issue at hand, and the quality of the work, including clarity, originality, depth of thought and style.